K-12 AI Policy and Rollout Kit
Board-ready policy, staff and student guidelines, a vendor rubric, and a 90-day plan. Starter templates a district can adapt in a week, not a semester.
Walk into your next cabinet meeting with a policy draft, a board memo, and a rollout plan your counsel can mark up instead of a blank page.
Beer Bond holder? Sign in and it is already yours.
The situation you are in
Teachers are already using generative AI. Some are open about it, most are not, and a few have pasted student essays with names attached into a general-purpose chatbot to get grading help. Students figured it out a year before the adults did. Your board has heard from a parent, read a headline, or sat through a conference session, and now the superintendent has asked you to "bring us an AI policy." Meanwhile three vendors want fifteen minutes to show you the AI feature they added to a product you already own, and the terms of service changed last month.
You do not have a semester to work this out. You have a device refresh in flight, an E-rate window, a help desk queue, and maybe one person on your team who has time to think about this at all.
What this kit is
A starter set. Sixteen templates, an eleven-chapter guide, and a 90-day plan, written so a district technology director or curriculum lead can produce a board-ready draft in about a week of part-time work, then hand it to counsel and the policy committee for the real edits.
It is opinionated where opinions help. It says disclosure beats detection for academic integrity. It says the under-13 line is a hard line, not a preference. It says the district decides which tools are approved, not each teacher, and that the vetting process has to be fast enough that teachers use it instead of routing around it. Where a district reasonably differs, the templates leave room.
What is inside
- The guide. Eleven chapters covering where districts actually are, the principles to settle before writing anything, the legal frame in plain English, what belongs in policy versus procedure versus guideline, student and staff rules, vetting tools, communicating with families and the board, incident response, the 90-day rollout, and the annual review.
- Governance templates. Board policy in policy-service format. Administrative procedure. A two-page board memo in recommendation format.
- People templates. Student guidelines for K-5, 6-8, and 9-12. Staff acceptable use. Academic integrity addendum. Family letter. A three-session PD outline.
- Operations templates. Full scored vendor vetting rubric. Data privacy checklist. Incident response procedure. Week-by-week 90-day rollout plan. Annual review checklist. Glossary.
- START-HERE. A one-page map that tells you which document to bring to which meeting.
Every template uses [BRACKETED PLACEHOLDERS] for district-specific items and carries a "How to adapt" note. They are plain markdown, so they paste into a word processor, a policy platform, or a wiki without fighting formatting.
Who wrote it and why he can
Wayne Bridges has spent years as a public-sector solutions engineer working with K-12 and higher education districts on device management, endpoint security, and identity. He has sat in the meetings where a district tries to make a technology decision with incomplete information, a hard deadline, and a board that wants a one-page answer. He builds and runs AI agent systems daily, so the guidance on what these tools do with data comes from operating them, not from reading about them.
He is not a lawyer. That is stated plainly on every template and is the reason the kit is built to be reviewed rather than adopted as-is.
What this is not
- Not legal advice. Your counsel reviews everything. The legal chapter is written so you can brief counsel efficiently, not replace them.
- Not a curriculum. It does not tell teachers how to teach with AI. It sets the rules of the road so that instructional work can happen safely.
- Not a product recommendation. No vendors are named. Tools change monthly; the rubric for judging them does not.
- Not a finished policy. It is a draft that is about 80 percent of the way there. The last 20 percent is local: your state law, your policy service, your board's appetite.
Who should not buy this
- Districts whose policy service has already published an AI policy that counsel has reviewed and the board has adopted. You may still want the rubric and the rollout plan, but you do not need the policy templates.
- Anyone looking for a list of approved tools. That list is yours to build, and the rubric shows how.
- Anyone who needs the document to be state-specific out of the box. State student privacy laws vary. The kit treats them as a class and tells you where to insert your state's requirements.
If you are a tech director or curriculum lead who has been asked for a policy and has no time to start from zero, this is for you. Read START-HERE, open the board memo, and you have your first meeting covered.
- District technology directors and CIOs who have been told to 'bring us an AI policy' and have a device refresh, an E-rate filing, and a help desk to run at the same time.
- Curriculum and instruction leaders who need student and staff guidelines that teachers will actually follow, written by grade band, with an academic integrity position that holds up.
- Principals and superintendent's cabinet members who need to brief the board, answer families, and approve or deny vendor requests without becoming AI experts first.
- A board policy draft in policy-service format, with numbered sections and placeholders, ready for counsel and your policy committee in one sitting.
- Student guidelines for K-5, 6-8, and 9-12 that a teacher can read aloud, plus an academic integrity addendum that defines disclosure instead of banning tools.
- A scored vendor vetting rubric and a data privacy checklist so 'can we use this tool' has a repeatable answer instead of a meeting.
- A week-by-week 90-day rollout plan covering governance, pilots, PD, family communication, and the first board update.
- An incident response procedure for the four things that will happen: misuse, deepfakes, student data in a prompt, and a vendor breach.
- 11-chapter guide, about 15,000 words, from principles through the 90-day rollout and annual review
- 16 editable templates in plain markdown: board policy, administrative procedure, 3 grade-band student guideline sets, staff acceptable use, academic integrity addendum, family letter, 2-page board memo, vendor rubric, data privacy checklist, incident response, 3-session PD outline, 90-day rollout plan, annual review checklist, glossary
- The AI Tool Vetting Rubric, full scored version with weighting and pass/fail gates
- A 3-session professional development outline with agendas, activities, and exit tickets
- A START-HERE map that tells you which template answers which meeting
- Plain-English legal frame covering FERPA, COPPA, CIPA, PPRA, state student privacy laws, and accessibility obligations, written for a non-lawyer to brief a lawyer
- Updates to the kit for 12 months as federal guidance and state laws move
11 chapters · 16 template files · read on the site or download the zip.
The AI Tool Vetting Rubric
One page to decide whether an AI tool gets near your students. Free, no login.
- Where districts actually are — The honest state of AI in K-12 as of late 2026. Teachers ahead of policy, students ahead of teachers, vendors ahead of everyone, and boards asking for a document. Why that is normal and what it means for how you start.
- Principles before policy — Seven principles to settle with your cabinet before anyone opens a template. Each one is a decision your district has to make, and each one shows up in the policy language downstream.
- The legal frame in plain English — FERPA, COPPA, CIPA, PPRA, state student privacy laws, federal AI guidance, and accessibility obligations, explained by a non-lawyer for a non-lawyer who has to brief a lawyer. What each one requires, where AI tools trip it, and what to ask counsel.
- Policy vs. procedure vs. guideline — Why the board policy is two pages and the procedure is six. What belongs at each layer, who owns it, how each one changes, and the mistake that produces a twenty-page board policy nobody reads.
- Students — Guidelines by grade band, the academic integrity position, and what disclosure looks like in practice. Why K-5 is teacher-mediated, why 6-8 is the hardest band, and how to write a rule a ninth grader will respect.
- Staff — Acceptable use for teachers and staff. The student-data-in-prompts problem, AI in grading and feedback, what to say about personal accounts, and how to run professional development that changes behavior instead of checking a box.
- Vetting and approving tools — A repeatable process for deciding which AI tools get near students and staff. The inventory you do first, the rubric, the data privacy agreement, the approved list, and how to keep the turnaround short enough that teachers use the process instead of routing around it.
- Communicating with families and the board — What families actually want to know, what the board actually needs to decide, and how to give each of them a document they can use. The board memo, the presentation, the family letter, and the questions to prepare for.
- Incidents — The four things that will happen: student misuse, deepfakes and synthetic media, student data in a prompt, and a vendor breach. What each one looks like, who owns the response, the steps in order, and how to write it down so the next one goes better.
- The 90-day rollout — Thirteen weeks from "bring us a policy" to a board-adopted policy, a live procedure, guidelines in staff hands, tools inventoried and sorted, PD delivered, families informed, and a 90-day report. What happens each week, who owns it, and what to cut if you have to.
- Keeping it alive — What happens after day 90. The annual review cycle, the handful of metrics worth tracking, what to measure and what not to bother with, how to watch for changes in law and guidance, and how to keep the policy from becoming the document nobody reads.
Is this legal advice?
No. The author is a public-sector solutions engineer, not an attorney. Every template carries a disclaimer and every one of them should go through district counsel before adoption. The kit gets you to a reviewable draft fast. Counsel makes it yours.
Will it fit our policy service's numbering and format?
The board policy and administrative procedure use a generic policy-service structure with [POLICY NUMBER] and [SERIES] placeholders and a cross-reference block. Most districts drop it into their existing series in an hour. If your service publishes its own AI model policy, use ours to check theirs for gaps, especially on data handling and vendor vetting.
What grade bands does it cover?
All of K-12. Student guidelines come in three sets: K-5, 6-8, and 9-12. The board policy and staff documents apply district-wide. The guide explains where the bands differ and why, including the COPPA under-13 line.
How current is it, and what happens when the law changes?
Written September 2026 against the federal guidance and state laws in force then. Laws and guidance change. One payment. When the kit is revised, the current version is what you see and download from your account, and the guide tells you what to re-check each year.
What is the refund policy?
30 days, no questions. If it does not save you a week, email and you get your money back.
Can I share it with my cabinet and policy committee?
Yes. The license covers district-internal use: your cabinet, board, counsel, principals, and staff. It does not cover reselling it, posting it publicly, or distributing it to other districts. If a neighboring district wants it, send them the link.
K-12 AI Policy and Rollout Kit. $79, once.
Card through Stripe. Yours the moment it lands: read it here, download the zip, keep it. Or a Beer Bond: every deal and every product, for life.